FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Unlock Stacey’s page so people can edit the page. The photo should also be updated.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Why has this been deleted?

      Loading editor
    • I didn't think it was being put to any use. Is there a way I can undelete it? I didn't realise you were the creator, sorry Benny.

      Would it be better adding the continuity error to the notes section to the episode the error occurred in? Or would you prefer a separate page?

        Loading editor
    • Or we could add continuity errors in the character profiles such as "Background information".

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Pls stop undoing my edits I will fix them all just give me a chance pls

      Loading editor
    • View all 18 replies
    • Thank for u for reconsider I am really grateful to u

        Loading editor
    • Your begging had nothing to do with the template being reverted. Myself and Sam have parted ways with the Wiki hence why the template has been changed back.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, 

    Would it be possible for you to create a page for Danny Hardcastle? I would do it myself but I am not sure how you all want pages formatted at the moment so I figured it's easier if you do it.

      Loading editor
    • Hi Henry,

      Yeah sure, once a character has appeared on-screen then they can get a page created. Although all I ask is that you use a screenshot rather than a promotional picture as the BBC started getting a bit strict, and we don't want our site being closed down.

        Loading editor
    • Yeah, I saw your post on Discussions. Thanks.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I feel the editors on the Wiki would be a lot more productive if a to-do list was created - at the moment anybody outside of the admins is randomly editing things: I think things would be done a lot quicker if there was a list of things to do. 

    What's your opinion on this? 

      Loading editor
    • I was meaning to do this awhile ago, I'll start to collaborate one once I get the chance, thanks for reminding me to do this! We also need to think of an initial design for the page, Kelvin did create a To-do list, the link is here - EastEnders Wiki:To do list, however, it was established in 2015, so it's quite old and needs updating.

        Loading editor
    • I don't think the design needs to be anything fancy; bulleted lists or tables would do. Users could perform the task and notify an admin/mod who would update the page.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • This big recent edit that you have carried out, replacing promotional images with screenshots and removing the galleries, I don't see why that was necessary, especially the removal of galleries?

      Loading editor
    • The significant recent change had come about when the BBC started getting strict about how their promotional images are being used, that's the reason the promos have been removed because quite frankly we don't want to take the risk of the site being closed down and everybody's hard work being lost.

      As for the gallery section, the other admins and I concluded removing this as it isn't necessary and it clogs up the site with things that aren't needed.

      The site has been due with a new regime for a while. We are hoping to have a standard plot, cast list and filming location for every episode.

      The other admins and I will be creating a manual of style, a bit like the Corriepedia site has done so when users come along, they know how the new regime is to work.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • You will need to find a bigger background image as on my desktop computer its at 100% and it does not fill the screen I recommend at least 1920x1080 px. On small devices it will downscale but it can't seem to upscale.  

    Image Background
      Loading editor
    • Hi Kelvin,

      There a few questions I've asked on the FB group, and I'll sort that out asap.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi Sam

    When you rename or move a page or pages it's very important you leave a redirect behind as if you don't it will created broken links.

    https://eastenders.fandom.com/wiki/Special:BrokenRedirects?limit=500&offset=0

    For example you re-named Episode 07 (12 March 1985) to Episode 7 (12 March 1985) which means the 12 March 1985 goes still goes to the page Episode 07 (12 March 1985) as a redirect was not left. It's basically like a forwarding address.

      Loading editor
    • Thanks for telling me this!

      I don't understand why Episode 7 was named Episode 07 in the first place and why Episode 990 was named Episode 0990?

      Also why haven't any of the episode pages got "th" or "nd" on the dates?

        Loading editor
    • Hi Sam

      The reason why some episode had leading zeros is so when they are viewed in category such as 1985 Episodes they would keep in order.

      The reason why all the Ordinal indicator st, nd, rd and th were removed was because when searching for broadcast dates it gave incorrect search results.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello,

    I noticed you deleted Chantelle Atkins' page as she had not been seen on screen yet. Do you think it is appropriate to recreate this page now, as she has been confirmed to appear later this month? 

    Thanks,

    Henry

      Loading editor
    • I’d like to leave the page uncreated until she appears on screen as we currently know very little about her meaning the information on her page will be very minor and not important.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I noticed the design of infoboxes across the wiki have changed - do you know why this happened? It doesn't look as good.

      Loading editor
    • The info boxes have been changed on a mutual agreement between me, Kelvin and EastEditor using portable infoboxes. I think it looks much neater than the original.

        Loading editor
    • it looks almost as cramped as tk maxx, but thanks for your response.

        Loading editor
    • As much as we all deserve our own opinions, we also have to take into consideration on the way our words may effect some people. Your comment may have offended the person who created the new design. I'm presuming and hoping you didn't mean it intentionally, just think before you type in future :)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.