All posts by Robbief006

Hi Jacob. I agree with you completely, the style of Charlotte Conquests' page is a lot cleaner and easier to manage in my opinion.

Struggling with Zoe at the moment, she acts like a spoilt 13 year old at the best of times.

Hi Lewis, I am aware you have been creating guest character pages for a while now, and do not worry, your message is not rude, we all have our projects on the wiki, and I get it's not great when someone does something you have contributed to without permission. I will look into who has been creating them and get back to you.

Thanks,

Robbief006

Hi Connor, I do know this is hard position to be in, and I do not want to seem critical of an admin, but I would lean towards a yes for removal.

This is because of the reasons you have raised above, especially in regard to characters Tobias and Jasmine being upgraded to regular several times by Anna, despite being told not too you by yourself. Additionally, cast changes has had multiple disputes, as when characters has been confirmed to return by reputable sources, it always seems to be reverted, as well as adding unnecessary categories to actor pages.

As well as this, I have felt during my time as moderator that I have not been able to get hold of Anna, and she does not take part of any votes of site changes when they are brought to Admins. I feel the best Admin should always respond to all messages and votes.

That being said, I would like to thank Anna for her years of editing on this site, and if she does stay, I hope my comments can be seen as nothing personal, but ways to improve.

Thanks

Robbie

Great, please have a look at your message walls when you get the chance

Thanks

Robbie

Of course, I am just going over the pages now to ensure they all have a rating, then I will let you know :)

That would be great if you could, and would be greatly appreciated :)

More than happy to have you along if you would like to, you have a good track record with Cindy, so that would be great to see on other pages.

Good is definitely satisfactory for a lot of our original characters, with the availability of upsides from 1985-2007, but of course, we still hope to upgrade them all with time.

Thanks :)

Robbie

Hi, the reason why we are going with 2014–2025 as discussed before is because of the fact that multiple sources at the BBC have said that Lacey has left the cast. This cannot be maternity leave, as you cannot take that 9 months after your baby is born. Lacey does have a high chance of coming back, but it’s not a 100% chance as she’s no longer employed by the BBC.

Agreed, like I said, any further would be unnecessary.

My opinion on this remains the same as when we discussed it on the Discord server: I would like this to be implemented on the wiki as soon as possible.

My only question is whether you think that grandparents/children (not great-grandparents) should be included, given that they are close relations. However, I am not opposed to excluding them for the sake of simplicity in the infoboxes.

Thanks,

Robbie

@Annawise79 On this Wiki, we should have the full name on the character introduction page due to the fact this is an EastEnders wiki where we give our viewers all the information available. Wikipedia is much more general information. We should not strive to be like them.

Well, to ensure this wiki is consistent and factual, I believe that we should have them as their credited name.

This is because we do not do this for every character, such as Phillip 'Phil' Mitchell, Katherine 'Kathy' Cotton, Kathleen 'Kat' Moon, and Georgina 'Gina' Knight, as they are definitely not credited as such. Also, it will ensure that characters are linked better for the LOA pages.

Thanks

Robbie

Always be Sharon and Linda for me.

I can see both sides to this, as long as it is consistent across the wiki. I honestly don't know which one I like more.

That is a fair point.

Hi, I just added it as I do believe she appeared just before the duff duff.

Thanks for pointing this out,

Robbie

As @BertieMoon is creating missing actor pages with me, I am going to explain why I ended up agreeing with this proposal.

I believe it will work to make all actor pages consistent with a clear format. The only thing I am reluctant about this is with smaller actors and those who have portrayed multiple characters, but as seen in the comments above, Taylor talked me through how this would work. The pictures are no problem, as if we cannot find one, and the actor is prevalent enough, we can just use one of the characters.

Thanks for listening, and I am open to any questions,

Robbie