All posts by J.a.c.o.b46

A reply to J.a.c.o.b46

J.a.c.o.b46·11/11/2025

@Cf712 @Kelvin 101 @Walford, E20 @Benny1982 @Zachlikesninjago

What are your guys' thoughts?

A reply to J.a.c.o.b46

J.a.c.o.b46·11/11/2025

Thank you :)

J.a.c.o.b46·10/31/2025 in General

Admins - Directors and Writers Pages

@Talking-Friends-link @Cf712 @Robbief006 @Kelvin 101 @Walford, E20 @Benny1982 @Zachlikesninjago @Clarkybob97

Hello fellow admins and moderators, I am here to ask for everyone's opinions on how the director and writers pages should be laid out. At the moment we have two different layouts.

We have a layout that has the decade as headings and then the years as subheadings as seen here: Lynne Dallow | EastEnders Wiki | Fandom

While I like this separation, I do personally think it looks quite messy and a lot going on.

The other version is just having the year as the heading and no subheadings. This can be seen here: Charlotte Conquest | EastEnders Wiki | Fandom

This would be my vote as personally i think it looks cleaner and clearer.

But of course I wanted a vote by everyone so we can get the majority and finally get the pages consistent with the agreed layout.

Thanks :)

Jacob

A reply to Cf712

J.a.c.o.b46·10/20/2025

Hi Connor, I know how hard it was to implement these rules.

I have experienced several edit wars with Annawise and it really gets to me as it makes it seem like I am not valued as an admin despite being active on this wiki for many years. I have also asked her to stop reverting my edits as changes I have made were agreed by all other admins. But she continues to undermine me and revert them.

One admin is not better than another. If you have a problem with an admins edit in my opinion you should consult with them personally and say why you think the edit is wrong. Not just revert it constantly unless it is spoilers or misinformation that can be damaging.

So i am in favour of a removal of admin rights from Annawise

Thank you,

Jacob

A reply to J.a.c.o.b46

J.a.c.o.b46·9/3/2025

I disagree with the edits you have made by getting rid of the names

A reply to J.a.c.o.b46

J.a.c.o.b46·9/3/2025

But we aren't wikipedia. We want to be different and more factual. We have always had the characters full names. They have been stated in the show

A reply to J.a.c.o.b46

J.a.c.o.b46·9/3/2025

@Annawise79 what aspects of wikipedia ones do you propose?

J.a.c.o.b46·9/3/2025 in General

Crediting characters with nicknames

@Annawise79 @Benny1982 @Clarkybob97 @Cf712 @Kelvin 101 @Talking-Friends-link @Zachlikesninjago @Robbief006

Hello fellow admins/moderators,

I just wanted everyone's opinions on crediting characters that have nicknames. The main examples are Rebecca 'Bex' Fowler and William 'Will' Mitchell as I have seen being credited as so.

My opinion is surely we don't need to put that and only put down what the are actually credited. Just Bex Fowler and Will Mitchell as that is all they are simply down as.

We don't put it for other characters so was just wondering why we had it for those specific characters.

Thanks,

Jacob

A reply to BiancaJackson45

J.a.c.o.b46·8/27/2025

It would be for everyone :) But we can lock it again after your edit if needs be

A reply to Taylor.2317

J.a.c.o.b46·8/13/2025

Looks great to me!

A reply to Taylor.2317

J.a.c.o.b46·7/28/2025

Yeah i like this too!!

A reply to Taylor.2317

J.a.c.o.b46·7/8/2025

We can't do anything unfortunately until all admins and moderators have replied

A reply to Robbief006

J.a.c.o.b46·6/30/2025

All sounds great to me!

A reply to Taylor.2317

J.a.c.o.b46·6/9/2025

@Benny1982 @Kelvin 101 @Clarkybob97 @Annawise79 @Zachlikesninjago @Walford, E20

What are your guys' stance?

A reply to Taylor.2317

J.a.c.o.b46·6/3/2025

Hi Taylor, thank you for your request!

As far as I know there is no limit but I could be wrong so if any other admin would be able to answer this that would be great.

If there is no limit then I am more than happy to give you my backing. You have contributed a lot to the wiki and come up with some great ideas!!

Thanks, Jacob :)

A reply to Taylor.2317

J.a.c.o.b46·6/2/2025

Even the page rating sections?

A reply to Taylor.2317

J.a.c.o.b46·6/2/2025

Since there has been no more active talk or any disagreements apart from the page rating section shall we say it's safe to assume that Taylor's idea of the promos and see also parts have been approved?

A reply to Taylor.2317

J.a.c.o.b46·5/27/2025

@Walford, E20 i don't agree at all with what you just said. We all need to vote and have our say. You are not the top main admin. We all are equal so we should all have our say!

A reply to Taylor.2317

J.a.c.o.b46·5/27/2025

I personally think that the current templates take up way too much room and it makes it look quite cluttered so having it moved to the infobox seems like a great compromise

A reply to Taylor.2317

J.a.c.o.b46·5/27/2025

Hey! Personally I like all of this! I was actually wanting a promos through the years tabs so i really am in favour of this!!!